Now, before this summer, I didn't know
there was a difference. I mean, they're all just superhero movies,
right? Well, according to a friend, the difference is huge. DC Comics
“sucks” and that apparently hindered TDKR in some way. I
don't know what he was talking about. Personally, I like the movie
better than The Amazing Spider-Man (maybe it's because I love
Christian Bale and Joseph Gordon-Levitt, but Christopher Nolan wrote
such a great ending to the trilogy that it was hard for TASM,
which was just setting things up, to compete).
I also don't know where, when, or why
his vendetta against DC Comics began, but I don't think it's fair to
judge a movie based on the studio that made it.
“Wait. Aren't you the girl who just
slandered Pixar for Brave even when it got positive
reviews...just because it was Pixar?”
Yes. Shut up. This is completely
different.
Think of it like this: if a student
consistently gets As on tests but then gets a C, it would be fair to
say that the C was not the student's best work. But it's unfair a
teacher to grade a test differently because of the student or their
past tests, no matter what the grade.
It's like that.
I seriously loved The Dark Knight
Rises. I was completely engrossed the whole two hours and
forty-five minutes; I even sat through it twice. I still liked The
Amazing Spider-Man, I just didn't connect emotionally like this
final piece of the Batman puzzle did (okay, that's a lie. I cried
three times at TASM).
And I definitely don't care which
studio made which. Whether it was the same one that pushed out The
Avengers or the one that has the monopoly on Christopher Nolan
doesn't matter. After all, they're just guys in tights.
No comments:
Post a Comment